Postharvest Loss Assessment of Orange-Fleshed Sweet Potatoes in Rwanda

Description

This report was created by the Horticulture Innovation Lab's project, Reducing postharvest losses in Rwanda. The project aims to understand and identify the most efficient ways to reduce postharvest losses in Rwanda. Through postharvest innovations and interventions, this project works to help farmers and agribusiness enterprises gain better return on investments by adopting appropriate technology and reducing postharvest losses.

Summary highlights of postharvest losses in orange-fleshed sweet potatoes

Orange-fleshed sweet potato (OFSP) is a relatively new crop for Rwanda with two decades of significant support from the NGO community. The crop is primarily grown as a livelihoods and food security crop with a strong nutritional component. The OFSP study focused on understanding the current landscape, the challenges faced by all stakeholders in the value chain.

OFSP is being grown in eighteen districts across the country - Muhanga, Kamonyi, Ruhango, Rulindo, Musanze, Burera, Gakenke, Ngororero, Rwamagana, Gatsibo, Kayonza, Karongi, Rutsiro, Rubavu, Gicumbi, Bugesera, Nyaruguru and Nyamagabe. Around 70% of sweet potatoes growers adopted OFSP and are being supported by RAB, CIP and other NonGovernment Organizations (NGO) in the supply of vines and extension services.

The main challenges for OFSP include uncertain market demand and uncertain supply issues for processors, both of which are linked: due to the lack of a local fresh market, farmers may be reluctant to engage in OFSP production, while processors cannot engage in processing without assured supply.

The study found that at the farm level, 22.5 percent of the produce had defects, 3.5 percent was decayed and 35 percent had mechanical damage. On average, 10 percent of the produce was sorted out and consumed at home or used as animal feed (depending on the level of damage). At the wholesale level, 15 percent of the produce had defects, 5 percent had decay and 20 percent had mechanical damage. At the wholesale level, the team observed only one case of 5 percent produce being sorted out. 

Key findings

  • Traditional hoe harvest techniques can be very damaging. Once cut, if not cured, the tuber becomes more susceptible to degradation and insects.

  • Rough handling

  • Farmer cash flow issues may result in early harvesting, leading to a poor-quality product (immature roots are too fibrous.)

  • Farmers' use stagnant water to wash the tubers. This can induce fungal diseases.

  • Rough handling leads to bruised and damaged skin of OFSP. OFSP is harvested by a hoe that cuts the produce. Workers move the produce from one point to the other on the field while sorting, loading, unloading and transport on their heads. Handling damage lowers the shelf life.

  • Weevil and other pest infestation due to cracking.

  • Low use of adapted “curing.”

  • Farmers use traditional practices such as storing in the ground or covered by grass, that have potential to cause damage and require assessment.

  • A CIP model storage solution (zero energy) was made of brick to protect against theft and was therefore expensive.

  • Poor road conditions and carrying loads on heads are common.

  • Long travelling distance and hilly terrain increase difficulties in transport

Methodology

To understand the postharvest losses in orange fleshed sweet potato, the project conducted Value Chain Analysis and Commodity Systems Assessment Methodology (CSAM).

Postharvest losses were measured using a modified Commodity Systems Assessment Methodology (CSAM). The CSAM is a methodology for describing and evaluating the planning, production, postharvest handling and marketing of agricultural commodities. The modified CSAM includes interviews of stakeholders, observations of handling practices, and direct measurements of quality and quantity losses throughout the value chain (see page 26).

A value chain analysis was completed in order to identify constraints. The analysis was completed using interviews with key actors, site visits, and a literature review (see page 12). 

Type

Report

Value Chain

Postharvest practices

Countries

Rwanda